Meta’s big bet on AI is forcing millions of brands into Slopvertising.

Ryan Blunden
3 min read
Meta’s big bet on AI is forcing millions of brands into Slopvertising.
Photograph: Andrew McGibbon/Corbis for The Guardian

To Mark Zuckerberg, the millions of small businesses that rely on Meta Ads are the Geese at his Foie Gras Farm.

The company has invested anywhere from $130 million to $145 million in the AI race for supremacy. Behind the boasts of ‘record-breaking AI adoption from small business’ is a sinister margin-squeeze on those that advertise.

This turns once-unique brands into commodities. But it also presents an opportunity to those that are prepared to take it.

Looking out for numero uno

Meta is an advertising business, not a social media business.

In Q2 2026, the company reported a record-breaking $59.3bn in advertising revenue, up 27% year over year. At the same time, they sunk a whopping $31bn into their AI tech stack build-out across the same period.

Their priority is the maximisation of their own shareholder returns, and proving their business case for AI. The marketing budgets of the 10 million+ businesses reliant on Meta ads are siphoned to deliver that proof. According to Meta’s second quarter results of 2026, global prices-per-ad increased 12% and the number of ad impressions increased 14%1. Global time-spent on Meta’s apps grew “double-digits”2, resulting in more inventory and more impressions and more demand. Constant manipulation of both the feed recommendation and ad delivery engine services Zuckerberg’s AI Big Bet.

Quarter over quarter, advertising revenue continues to hit all-time highs. Ad delivery systems constantly change, squeezing advertiser margins and leveraging their reliance. All to prove a point to Meta Shareholders, Silicon Valley and the market at large.

Meta is optimising for their own bottom line, not yours.

An impossible challenge

To feed this compute-engine, brands are faced with an impossible creative challenge.

Ad delivery algorithms now demand an impossible level of creative volume, velocity and variation to reign in ad fatigue3. You either hand over creative control or risk your brand becoming tired, exhausted and over-saturated.

In May 2025, Mark Zuckerberg laid out his vision for the future of advertising – a world where brands hand the marketing keys over to Meta because, his words: “you don’t need any creative”. Even though Meta was forced to wind back these comments in late 2025, the $130 billion to $145 billion invested in “infrastructure” since then implies that was just lip-service. Current creative benchmarks suggest SME businesses need to be pumping about 5 ads a week, or 240 a year. This forces the hand of many who are reliant on Meta ads to keep the lights on. Adopt the generative AI features in your ad account, or see your margins get squeezed.

CFO Susan Li boasted “9 million small businesses on our platforms are now using at least one of our AI ad creative tools”. Anyone who runs Meta Ads knows that Ad Accounts are auto-opted into using these features. Brands are force-fed generative AI.

With ad account demands so high, the resource strain on brands that don’t want Meta to run their brand becomes acute.

It’s all a trap

Advertising is a major competitive lever for businesses.

It acts in defense of your market share from your rivals and validates your prices for customers. For it to be effective, it needs to be original and relevant.

By definition, Generative AI is not original, nor are the ads it produces - making them incredibly shitty at the job of defending market share or validating your prices. Research has shown that creative campaigns are vastly more efficient at driving market share vs dull ads4. Yet, the creative launch speed and creative volume demanded by Meta Ad Accounts kills the very thing that makes brands memorable. When a business leans into generative AI creative, they’re optimising to short-term cheap CPM’s at the expense of conversion efficiency over-time (actual sales and brand memory). The very act of adopting generative AI in advertising, stunts the growth of your business.

If a claimed 9 million small businesses have ‘adopted’ Meta’s generative AI, they merge into a giant ‘sea of sameness’. In the short-term the platform will boast incredible results because it can. But over the long-haul, they enter a slow, margin-creeping death spiral.

Generative AI in advertising will see engagement drop, distinctiveness die and once-unique brands turned into commodities.

Ironically, this presents an opportunity.

If your competitors adopt Generative AI in their advertising, they’ll cede market share to your brand. It’s up to you to capture it.

Share